Triesman hits out at Terry ban
Former Football Association chairman Lord Triesman has hit out at the decision to ban John Terry for only four matches for racist abuse.
- Related Content
Chelsea captain Terry was handed the suspension and a £220,000 fine after being found guilty of using a racist slur towards Anton Ferdinand by an independent FA regulatory commission.
The ban was half of that given to Liverpool striker Luis Suarez for racially abusing Manchester United defender Patrice Evra.
The FA commission said Terry had been given a lesser ban because the "racist insult was issued only once", as opposed to repeated use by Suarez.
But Lord Triesman told the BBC: "It may be when you look at all the detail they thought there were reasons for [it]. I can't see it."
Terry is due to decide during the international break whether to appeal his guilty verdict.
Lord Triesman added: "He's within his rights to appeal. My own view is that it would be more sensible to apologise and accept it's not a good standard," he said.
"I just don't believe in this day and age that anybody can think that it's okay, and that you don't owe an apology, not least to the other player."
The fallout from the Terry verdict saw Chelsea team-mate Ashley Cole launch a foul-mouthed Twitter tirade at the FA, something which saw him charged with misconduct on Monday.
English football's governing body announced yesterday they were set to introduce a code of conduct for England players and Lord Triesman, who was their chairman between 2008 and 2010, wants something similar included in contracts at club level.
He said: "What I think is important is for clubs to tell their very highly-paid employees what general standards are expected of them on the pitch or in the training ground.
"Every club should set those standards and say, 'Here's a set of standards we expect you to stick to'."
He added: "Some clubs have done elements of it, but what hasn't happened is saying to people, 'What you've done off the field impacts on our brand', and that should have been said years ago.
"Contracts have subsidiary documents of all kinds which get attached all the time, and I don't see any good reason why a general code of conduct in relation to people who are absolutely in the spotlight all the time should not be part of that."
Meanwhile, Juventus president Andrea Agnelli believes there are striking similarities in the handling of the Terry case and that involving his manager Antonio Conte.
The Bianconeri boss was handed a 10-month ban from football following accusations he failed to report alleged match-fixing involving former club Siena during the 2010/11 season.
Conte's ban was recently reduced to four months and Agnelli believes comparisons can be drawn between that case and the one involving Terry.
"I had the chance of talking to Conte," he said at the Leaders in Football conference at Stamford Bridge this afternoon.
"We spent probably one or two minutes with him and it was enough to understand the truth to me.
"That was the decision we took in April but to me it was pretty much 'so we have to go through this, let's see what happens'.
"And what it proved, yet again, is that we need reforms to the sports justice code because in the end it was an inquisitory trial, where the word of one person was put against the word of another.
"It was a matter of who believed who. Trying to bring it back to the UK, I find it extremely difficult to understand when you look at the Terry case.
"He went through the civil courts with the same accusation and the civil court actually found him not guilty.
"The sporting federation, for whatever reason, found him guilty. It is the same exact accusation but it is matter of what you can bring into a trial room.
"That means somewhere at some point, even though the consequences of Terry and Conte are completely different, it must make people think if a civil court find you not guilty, how can a sport court find you guilty?"